LORIN service
Investigations & Digital Forensics
Investigative assignments require defined authority, confidentiality, factual discipline and careful handling of digital evidence. LORIN supports organisations needing structured fact finding and relevant technical analysis for internal decision-making.
Why this matters
Structured Fact Finding and Digital Evidence Review
Define authority, confidentiality and factual discipline before an investigative assignment begins.
A concern may require a structured fact-finding response, but the appropriate scope, jurisdiction, evidence requirements and specialist capability must be agreed before work begins.
LORIN can help clients frame an authorised investigative requirement in connection with wider security assessment, incident-simulation and systems-planning context.
Method
Engagement approach
Work is defined by client authority, applicable law and appropriate specialists. Scope examples include authorised device imaging, document or digital review, open-source intelligence, timeline and link analysis, interview coordination, preservation and reporting. No recoverability, admissibility or investigative outcome is guaranteed.
- 01
Confirm authority, objective and scope
- 02
Identify confidentiality and information-handling requirements
- 03
Define required facts, evidence and reporting expectations
- 04
Coordinate agreed specialist support
- 05
Provide structured findings within the authorised engagement
Consulting in practice
Relevant security context
Investigative assignments require defined authority, confidentiality, factual discipline and careful handling of digital evidence. LORIN supports organisations needing structured fact finding and relevant technical analysis for internal decision-making.
- Security-incident and control-review context
- Authorised fact-finding requirements
- Digital-information and open-source context
- Evidence and confidentiality considerations
- Links to risk assessment and physical-security testing
Scope and deliverables
What LORIN Reviews and Designs.
The relevant security context includes adversary-perspective testing, IT penetration-testing context, physical-security assessment and integrated-security planning.
Security-incident and control-review context
Authorised fact-finding requirements
Digital-information and open-source context
Evidence and confidentiality considerations
Links to risk assessment and physical-security testing
Typical outputs
What You Receive.
Relevant experience
Each engagement is scoped around the authorised requirement, confidentiality expectations and the facts that need to be established.
Frequently asked questions
Frequently Asked Questions.
What authority is required before an investigation begins?
An investigation begins with defined client authority, applicable legal and policy boundaries, a clear purpose, appropriate handling arrangements and any necessary specialist involvement.
How are confidential materials handled?
Confidential materials should be handled within the agreed scope, access controls, preservation arrangements and reporting limitations appropriate to the assignment.
When are specialist forensic providers needed?
Specialist forensic providers may be needed where an assignment requires specialist acquisition, recovery, authentication, examination or other technical work beyond the agreed advisory scope.
Speak with LORIN
Discuss a Sensitive Requirement
Discuss the facility, decision and project stage with a LORIN consultant.